Review into NHS trust’s handling of maternity report released

This article is more than 5 months old. Please read this page keeping its age in mind.

Shropshire Live’s Rowan Hall looks into the findings of NHS Improvement’s review into the way that Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust handled a 2018 report into its Maternity Services.

The review by NHS Improvement’s, with independent advice from Heather Tierney-Moore, executive summary concludes that when the outcome of the report by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists was less favourable than it had hoped for, “…the primary trust focus seemed to shift towards the perceived public reaction to the report, rather than getting the right internal assurance and scrutiny to ensure the improvement of services.” 

Much of the review focuses on whether the report was withheld from the trust’s board. The review’s executive summary says that the report was not withheld from the board, but that it should have gone to it and the Quality and Safety Committee sooner than it did. It also says that an addendum, which was produced before it went to the trust board, but not before it went to the Quality and Safety Committee, reduced the impact of the initial report.

What does the review cover?

Over two years ago, in July 2018, a report, with an addendum, by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists into maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust was published. It was written following a visit in July 2017.

However, in November 2019, a letter of complaint was sent to the National Medical Director by some of the families affected by the issues covered in the report.

According to the review, the letter alleged that the 2018 report was withheld from the trust board for a year and that the trust management sought to ‘water down’ the report by requesting that an additional document, an addendum, be produced by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Genealogists acknowledging that improvements had apparently been made, which was then added to the report when it was presented to the trust board.

And so, this review was set up, in order to determine whether members of trust management acted in accordance with accepted standards of governance.

What does the review say?

The executive summary first reads: “The process of getting agreement to the revised report and subsequent follow-up visit took up a significant further proportion of the overall timescale.”

It explains that a draft version of the report was first received by trust staff three months after the initial July 2017 visit and that trust staff were unhappy with it, feeling that it was an inaccurate representation of the service. It says that, following a response of this nature, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists made only minor changes and, at this stage, in December 2017, Simon Wright, Chief Executive, partly guided by staff feedback, initially wouldn’t accept the report.

The review goes on to say: “While we believe there were some genuinely held concerns about the report’s accuracy, it seems that the trust’s response at this stage was driven primarily by concerns about the impact of publishing the report in its current form.” Particularly, it explains that the trust was worried about potential public and media reaction and the knock-on effect of this on staff morale and public confidence.

The follow-up

The review’s executive summary goes on: following discussions, the trust accepted the report in January 2018, but concerns remained about its tone and context, particularly in relation to the executive summary. It says that the trust proposed that the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists addresses this and agree to a follow up exercise to evidence improvements that the trust had felt it had made. It explains that the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists refused to make further changes to the report, but did agree to a follow up exercise.

It evaluates: “Our view is that it was reasonable for the trust to request a follow up if it genuinely believed improvements had been made; it was appropriate to seek external assurance about the changes made and right that the public should get the most accurate and up to date account of the service.”

The review goes on: the action plan prepared in response to the report “…seemed to support the assertion that changes had been made in an attempt to address the concerns raised, although it was focussed more on process than outcomes. However, a single off-site meeting could only ever provide a limited degree of assurance, particularly in relation to issues of culture which cannot easily be assessed from a distance.”

It says: “Again, our view is that the primary purpose of the follow up exercise from the trust’s perspective was to mitigate the perceived adverse impact of publishing the initial report”, and it says that it understands why the trust was motivated to do this, seeing how some staff had been affected by intense media and public scrutiny.

The addendum

The review’s executive summary goes on to explain that an addendum was produced by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists summarising the findings of the follow up exercise. The review shows that the follow up visit took place in April 2018 and the addendum, first in draft form, was received in June 2018.

Summarising the addendum, the it says: “It is fair to say that the addendum, and particularly the covering paper prepared by management for the board, does reduce the impact of the initial report. This in itself is not of concern if the improvements were evidenced. However, as above, the degree of assurance from a single remote meeting could only be limited, and no such caveats were highlighted to the board or public. The covering paper to the board was overwhelmingly positive in tone, with its twelve-point summary reflecting only the most complimentary aspects of the addendum itself. The overall result was a document that gave the impression that issues in the maternity service had been largely resolved, when in fact there was significant further work to do.”

The board

However, the executive summary goes on to introduce the next paragraph with the short sentence: “The report was not withheld from the board.” It says that the board first saw the report in July 2018.

It explains that the review went in full to the Quality and Safety Committee before the addendum was produced. But “…our view is that the report should have gone to both forums sooner than it did. The trust wanted to wait for the addendum before publishing, but this should not have delayed internal scrutiny; QSC and the board should have had an earlier opportunity to scrutinise the actions being taken by the care group.”

It says: “We can understand why the trust wanted to publish the report alongside assurances of improvements made, but it would have been more transparent to publish sooner, along with a clear statement of how the issues would be addressed.”

It also notes that “All board members were kept informed of the report’s progress and could have challenged the approach or timelines, but did not.”

The conclusion

The review’s executive summary mentions two more things: “Governance arrangements at the service and care group level were not operating effectively in relation to the report and associated action plan…” and “Although a lot of work was initially done to implement actions and keep the action plan updated, there has been very limited ongoing scrutiny of the plan by local or corporate governance forums. This is concerning given the severity of some of the issues identified in RCOG’s report.”

The executive summary concludes by acknowledging that the trust was not obligated to commission the report, but chose to and to publish the results, but “…when the outcome was less favourable than hoped for, the primary trust focus seemed to shift towards the perceived public reaction to the report, rather than getting the right internal assurance and scrutiny to ensure the improvement of services.” 

What’s been the reaction to the review?

Ben Reid, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust Chair, has said: “I accept the findings of the report of the investigation into SaTH’s handling of the Trust-commissioned Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) report and will act on all of the recommendations.”

He has also said: “We, as a Trust, and I personally, have learnt a valuable lesson as to how we handle such reports in the future. I consider it my responsibility to take these lessons forward and ensure they are applied across the organisation.”

Dr Edward Morris, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists President, has said: “We welcome this thorough investigation by NHS Improvement which confirms that our invited review remained materially unchanged from when it was originally submitted to the Trust in October 2017.”

He has followed this up by saying: “While any decision around the dissemination of an invited review report remains the responsibility of a hospital Trust or Board, this NHSI investigation demonstrates that these reports should be shared promptly to ensure openness and transparency.”

Supporting Shropshire Live...
Rowan Hall
Rowan contributes articles to Shropshire Live. A Law undergraduate who lives in the county. He is currently studying Global Law at Queen Mary University of London and has a particular interest in writing about local government.
Advertise with us for £50 per week

Advertisement Feature

Simply Ribbons is not what you would expect in more ways than one!

Catering for individuals, small businesses and multinationals Simply Ribbons offer high-quality ribbons from UK and European manufacturers.
Telford College - Employer incentives 1

Telford College offers cash incentives to local employers

Telford College is offering Government-funded cash incentives to Shropshire employers, to give young people a helping hand with their careers.
- Advertising -
Advertise with Shropshire Live for £50 per week
Arrest Handcuff Generic

Drug warrant leads to three arrests in Shrewsbury

Three people have been arrested for drug offences in Shrewsbury following a warrant.
Pictured celebrating the new High Street fund are, from left, Steph Burton of Dawley Launderette, Claudia Churchill of Hilbrae Charity Shop with Boo the dog and Monika Janczylo of Golden Rolls

Fund to boost Dawley High Street

Great Dawley Town Council has launched a ‘Community High Street Fund’ with £35,000 available to help bring new life to the area.
Fossil Free Shropshire demonstrated outside Shirehall dressed as scientists in order to highlight a controversial new report from the Shropshire County Pension Fund.

Campaigners reject Shropshire County Pension Fund’s new climate risk report

Campaigners from Fossil Free Shropshire, a grassroots group calling on the Shropshire County Pension Fund to stop investing in fossil fuels, protested outside Shirehall over the release of a new Climate Risk report at today's pension fund meeting.

Match Report: Shrewsbury Town 2 – 2 Accrington Stanley

Shrewsbury Town once again concede late on as Steve Cotterill’s first league game in charge ends with a share of the spoils.
Racing at Chelmarsh Sailing Club. Photo: Terry Gumbley

Chelmarsh Sailing Club shortlisted for national award

Chelmarsh Sailing Club has been shortlisted for a prestigious national award following a hugely successful year on the water despite the challenges of the Coronavirus pandemic.

Match Preview: Shrewsbury Town v Accrington Stanley

In a huge boost for Shrewsbury Town supporters, 2,000 of them will witness Steve Cotterill’s first league game in charge this evening.
- Advertising -
Shropshire Chamber of Commerce Chief executive Richard Sheehan

Shropshire Chamber says Government needs to do more to help businesses

Shropshire Chamber of Commerce is calling on the Government to ensure it is meeting five key tests to help power an economic recovery.
Brian Evans, managing partner of Lanyon Bowdler

Shropshire law firm maintains excellent rankings in national guide

A Shropshire law firm has maintained its excellent rankings in a national guide, with 14 lawyers highlighted as recommended practitioners.

New radio station aimed at the Shropshire business community launches online

A brand new online radio station aimed at the Shropshire business community has launched online.
Cards for Good Causes supports more than 250 national and local charities

Cards for Good Causes pop-up reopens in Ludlow

Cards for Good Causes in Ludlow has reopened in a new location for 2020 with social distancing and covid-19 precautions in place.
The lights and music will be on daily from 4:30pm through to 10pm

Charity Christmas lights shine bright in Higher Heath

For the third year running, a house in Twemlows Avenue, Higher Heath, Whitchurch will be decked with lights in aid of the Midlands Air Ambulance Charity (MAAC).
Denise Kerr

Oswestry nursery manager launches debut children’s book

A manager from a local Oswestry Nursery, Jeanette Pearson-Tanner, has launched her debut children’s book – ‘The Pre School Detectives’.
- Advertising -
The live highlights included the battle between chivalric heroes in the popular Tournament of Knights

Online audiences entertained by digital 2020 Ludlow Medieval Christmas Fayre

Audiences were treated to the authentic historic festivities of the annual Ludlow Medieval Christmas Fayre when it was held online for the first time.
Severn Valley Railway is launching something really exciting from Bridgnorth this Christmas

Christmas is coming to the Severn Valley Railway

The Severn Valley Railway launches its special Christmas services on Thursday 3rd December and is celebrating an enthusiastic take-up of seats on board its trains.
Judy Collins

Folk legend Judy Collins tops artist list for Shrewsbury Folk Festival 2021

Shrewsbury Folk Festival has made its first major line-up announcement for 2021 after managing to secure the majority of its performers from this year's festival that was postponed due to coronavirus.
Karen Lee of The Walnut

Wellington’s Walnut restaurant is on the move

An award-winning Wellington restaurant has announced exciting plans to move premises and diversify its offer.
quuens fish and chips frontage

New fish and chip shop opens in Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury has a sparkling new takeaway - Queens Fish & Chips is now open serving a delicious range of hot food.
The Vegan Hub Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury Vegan Hub goes online

Despite the latest lockdown one of Shrewsbury's newest Vegan outlets is continuing to trade with orders now being taken online.
- Advertisment -

Advertisement Feature


moderate rain
3.7 ° C
4 °
3.3 °
93 %
90 %
5 °
5 °
4 °
4 °
5 °
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -

Latest Articles

- Advertisment -